Trump wants to privatize the Post Office

Misinformation abounds about USPS

If the Postal Service focused on doing a better job on its core mission, it wouldn’t be losing so much money and wouldn’t need to try to make up for the losses by venturing into “side businesses” such as delivering packages for Amazon, the argument went.

Let’s look at the facts.

Postal Service operations are profitable, and increasingly so. Through the first three quarters of Fiscal Year 2015, earned revenue exceeds business expenses by $1.2 billion. (The Postal Service funds itself through the sale of stamps and other products, not through taxpayer dollars.)

That’s ahead of the figures at this point last year. The Postal Service ended fiscal 2014 with a $1.4 billion operating profit, which in turn was better than 2013.

Why the improving picture? After falling sharply during the worst recession in 80 years, mail revenue is stabilizing amid a gradually improving economy. Meanwhile, as folks in Virginia and Washington D.C. and elsewhere shop online, package revenue is skyrocketing, making the Internet a net positive and auguring well for the future.

I would be remiss if I did not note the statements of the past postmaster general and his successor that record worker productivity by letter carriers, postal clerks and mail handlers also has contributed to the growing operating profitability, with fewer employees providing mail services to a growing number of addresses.

There is red ink at the Postal Service, but it has nothing to do with the mail or the Internet. Rather, it stems from Washington politics. In 2006, a lame-duck Congress mandated that the Postal Service prefund future retiree health benefits. No other government agency or private company in the country has to prefund for even one year; the Postal Service must prefund 75 years into the future and pay for it all over a decade. That $5.6 billion annual charge is the red ink.

The notion that a focus on expanding services has distracted the Postal Service from carrying out its top priority – speedy delivery of the mail – and has caused red ink has it almost entirely backwards.

Rather, the political interference by Congress in the form of the onerous and unfair prefunding mandate, signed into law by President George W. Bush, created an artificial ‘crisis’ at the Postal Service.

That, in turn, led the recently departed postmaster general to make the short-sighted decision to try to “shrink to survive” – reducing hours or even closing post offices and mail-processing plants, which in turn slowed the mail.

The new postmaster general, however, realizes that it’s illogical to respond to the pre-funding problem by degrading increasingly profitable postal services when that hurts not only the public but the Postal Service itself by reducing revenue. Some critics, however, including some lawmakers, still seek to end six-day delivery or door-to-door delivery, which would send the Postal Service into a downward spiral.

Pre-funding is a political problem that lawmakers created – and that they can and should address. If and when it takes up postal legislation, Congress also should preserve and strengthen the now-profitable postal networks. Not only is the Postal Service critical to our economy and our recovery by facilitating commerce and offering businesses and residents universal and affordable service, it also is the centerpiece of a $1.3 trillion national mailing industry that employs 7.5 million Americans in the private sector.

As for new ventures for the Postal Service, now that we’ve explained the source of the red ink and the cause of the slowing of the mail, the path ahead is a matter of common sense. Proposals that would meet the needs of an evolving society, boost job-creating businesses and generate earnings for the Postal Service – i.e. be a win for all involved – should be seriously considered.


Trump Moves to Gut the Post Office


The Truth About Trump’s War on Amazon and the US Postal Service

Getty Images/The Fiscal Times

President Trump issued an unexpected executive order Thursday night creating a federal task force to investigate the U.S. Postal Service’s finances, including its pricing and workforce costs.

“The USPS is on an unsustainable financial path and must be restructured to prevent a taxpayer-funded bailout,” the executive order reads.

The Postal Service on Friday said it welcomed the task force and that changes to the legal requirements under which it operates are needed: “As we have repeatedly stressed, these business model problems are serious, but solvable, and the President’s executive order … provides an opportunity to further consider these important public policy issues.”

The new task force will be led by Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin or his designee, with help from the directors of the Office of Management and Budget and Office of Personnel Management. The group will be required to issue a report outlining proposed reforms within 120 days.

Here’s what else you need to know:

Yes, the Postal Service is losing billions: As the executive order points out, the Postal Service has lost more than $65 billion since 2007. It reported a net loss of $2.7 billion last year, its eleventh straight year of net losses.

But it does not get direct taxpayer support: The USPS is a government agency, but it is run as an independent business, meaning that your tax dollars don’t directly fund it. “The Postal Service receives NO tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations,” the USPS website says. Postal rates are overseen by an independent commission.

The executive order is about Though the executive order does not mention Amazon by name, it was widely interpreted as an escalation of Trump’s long-running criticisms of the online retail giant, which the president has accused of bilking the postal service by not paying appropriate postage rates for package delivery. The USPS says that it is legally prohibited from charging Amazon and other shippers less than its delivery service costs, and that regulators have repeatedly examined and approved the Amazon deal.

But Amazon is probably helping, not killing, the USPS: A Citigroup analysis last year reportedly said that Postal Service prices would have to be increased by $1.46 per package in 2017, $1.41 in 2018 and $1.31 in 2019 to reflect the true costs of delivery and close its revenue shortfall. But most analysts say that the massive number of packages shipped by Amazon is helping USPS finances as the volume of first-class letter delivery and other types of mail continues to decline. And the Citigroup analyst who wrote the original report clarified recently that Amazon’s business could indeed be profitable for the USPS. Amazon likely gets a volume discounton its packages, but the Postal Service isn’t losing money from the deal. However, the task force might suggest that USPS charge Amazon and other companies more for parcel delivery.

At the same time, the Postal Service’s package delivery business is growing: The post office’s fiscal report for 2017 shows that packages and shipping brought in $19.5 billion in revenue, or 28 percent of the total for the year. Revenue from packages grew by more than $2 billion from the prior year, by far the most of any service category. “Although we continue to win customers and grow our package business, these gains are not sufficient to offset continuing declines in our mail business, which is our main source of revenue and contribution,” Postmaster General and CEO Megan Brennan said in February.

Trump’s ire may really be about Jeff Bezos and The Washington Post: “White House insiders describe the Amazon-U.S.P.S blowup as a thinly veiled attempt to retaliate against The Washington Post, which Bezos owns, for its frequently critical coverage of his administration,” Vanity Fair’s Maya Kosoff writes.

The executive order might open to door to more privatization: “Some parts of the order appear to hint at further privatization of the Postal Service, indicating that members of the task force should examine ‘the U.S.P.S. role in the U.S. economy and in rural areas, communities, and small towns,’” writes Michael D. Shear in The New York Times.

The Postal Service does have another big financial problem, though: In 2006, Congress mandated that the postal service prefund future health benefits for its retirees at a cost of about $5.6 billion a year over 10 years, a requirement that other federal agencies and private businesses do not face. “The prefunding requirement began as an effort to ensure Postal Service liabilities would not become a taxpayer burden if the Postal Service were to someday cease to exist,” a 2015 report by the Postal Service’s Office of Inspector General explained. The USPS has made some of those payments, exhausting its $15 billion statutory debt limit in the process. It defaulted on other prefunding payments, and its prefunding obligations still totaled $38 billion as of the end of the last fiscal year. “If that doesn’t meet the definition of insanity, I don’t know what does,” Bloomberg’s Barry Ritholtz wrote recently. “Without this obligation, the Post Office actually turns a profit.”


Please support real news, alternative media and education:


…and other vital resources

Together we make a difference.

Thanks for all you do.

Join the Revolution!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: