A Shot in the Dark.
There are no approved DNA/RNA “vaccines” for medicinal use in humans, hence their alternative name: next-generation vaccines. These injections are likely to face considerable regulatory hurdles before being approved for use because they only allow a fragment of resistance to generalized coronaviruses, rather than Covid-19 specifically, they may prompt a poor protective immune response (meaning multiple boosters may be promoted) and there’s a theoretical probability vaccine DNA or RNA can integrate into your genome.
A risky business…
“Lovecraft P.I. A Shot in the Dark”
1. How do the “vaccines” work?
RNA, closely related to DNA, is present in all living cells. The strand of it called messenger RNA is a sequence of genetic code that tells cells what proteins to build so that they can function.
“Researchers say that gene-based, or DNA and RNA, “vaccines” are faster and cheaper to produce in large quantities than conventional vaccines. (So they choose these faux vaccines over the real thing.)
Conventional vaccines often use “weakened” or “killed” versions of a virus. That means laboratories have to produce huge amounts of the virus. They often also include a protein, which is needed to spark a human immune response. But producing or reproducing a virus and a viral-protein can be time-intensive and expensive. So corporate sponsors have opted for what may be dangerous injections... instead of producing actual vaccines based on established scientific research.
The World Health Organization publishes updates on the so-called “candidate” vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 currently in clinical or pre-clinical evaluation. One of the most recent has about 34 RNA and DNA vaccines on the list. But so far none have been approved for use in humans.
Any downsides to DNA vaccines?
The WHO says many aspects of the immune responses caused by DNA injections are not yet fully understood. …Some use a DNA “plasmid,” a molecule that’s basically as a transportation vehicle for the DNA or RNA. Others use “electroporation” — electric pulses that create temporary openings in the cell membrane to let the injected substances get inside.”
The consequences of these injections are unknown at this point.
*In any case, you’re only likely to see the full effects of an experimental vaccine once it’s out in the community. As Doherty puts it, “it’s all one enormous experiment. People are trying to be safe, but even a partially effective vaccine might be useful. We’ll have to see how that’s evaluated by the regulatory bodies and the people making the ‘vaccines.'”
The dangers of DNA injections…
” 1. After injection, some DNA may persist and reach distant sites. Although the amount of DNA uptake by distant cells is not large, it is unlikely to be zero.”
2. Tolerance resulting from DNA injections would produce consequences both for the individuals and for the population, as tolerant individuals are expected to be more susceptible to infection and/or they may become carriers, a potentially much more serious problem.
DNA “Vaccines:” Scientific and Ethical Barriers to the “Vaccines of the Future“
“there is limited knowledge of the effects of these DNA injections on humans, since most tests have only been conducted on lab animals.
Potential side effects could include chronic inflammation, because the vaccine continuously stimulates the immune system to produce antibodies.
Other concerns include the possible integration of plasmid DNA into the body’s host genome, resulting in mutations, problems with DNA replication, triggering of autoimmune responses, and activation of cancer-causing genes.”
The Emerging Role of DNA “Vaccines“
Pink Panther’s Big Chill
Problems with DNA “Vaccines”
There are many potential problems and unanswered questions concerning the use of DNA injections. The possibility of insertional mutagenesis is a concern that needs to be more rigorously tested. While there is no evidence that the introduced DNA integrates into the host genome, if it were to occur, it would raise the specter of carcinogenesis; oncongenes may be turned on or tumor suppressor genes inhibited.
What if DNA circulated throughout the body after injection and integrated into germ cells? Might subsequent generations express the antigen from birth and develop tolerance, instead of immunity, to the pathogen? Anti-DNA antibody formation and the possibility of autoimmune diseases is another concern.
Developing real vaccines against COVID-19 requires further studies on gene mutations and how to avoid vaccine failure because of them.
“These are important issues because unlike other forms of gene therapy, which target very ill patients, DNA injections are targeted at the young and the healthy. If host cells express antigen for a prolonged period, what effect would that have on the immune response? Could it lead to host tolerance or an exaggerated, damaging attack on tissues expressing antigen? What is the exact nature of the gene transfer and antigen processing? While injections are given intramuscularly it may not be myocytes that are actually presenting antigens to T cells. What cells are taking up the gene? Initially it was thought that myocytes were expressing the DNA product and stimulating a cellular response, but further work indicates that dendritic cells found throughout the body (except in the brain) may be the antigen presenting cells. Because there is a brisk humoral response, it seems that some DNA or RNA injection substances are being delivered to B cells, macrophages or other MHC class II cells.“
DNA “vaccines” against COVID-19: Perspectives and challenges
“developing “vaccines” against COVID-19 require further studies on gene mutations and how to avoid “vaccine” failure because of them.”
ADVERSE EFFECTS OF MESSENGER RNA INJECTIONS
An Evidence Review from the Penn Medicine Center for Evidence-based Practice
“There are no specific guidelines for use of messenger RNA (mRNA) “vaccines” or contraindications to mRNA vaccines.
No large trials of any mRNA “vaccine” have been completed yet.
The only evidence on safety of mRNA “vaccines” comes from small phase I and phase II trials of SARS-CoV-2 “vaccines,” with follow-up typically less than two months.
Systemic adverse events such as fatigue, muscle aches, headache, and chills are common.
Severe systemic adverse events were reported by 5 to 10 percent of trial subjects.
Localized adverse events such as pain at the injection side are common.
Both systemic and local adverse events usually are resolved within one or two days.
The rate and severity of adverse events appears to be higher for the second dose of vaccine than for the first.
Higher vaccine doses appear to increase the rate and severity of adverse events.
Larger trials of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are in progress, with results expected in mid-2021.
There is not sufficient evidence to support any conclusions on the comparative safety of different mRNA “vaccines.“
Direct evidence on the comparative safety of mRNA injections and other “vaccines” is lacking.”
Are you a gambler or will you wait until these concerns are examined?
“Larger clinical trials of mRNA injections against the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus are in progress, and their results are expected in mid-2021. Once evidence from those trials is published, more certain conclusions about the safety of these “vaccines” may be reached.
Additional trials will be necessary to determine the relative safety of mRNA injections and vaccines using more established technologies.
Clinical guidance specific to the use of mRNA injections is lacking at this time, because of the lack of clinical evidence.”
Do not let them experiment on you: https://globalcrisis.info/forallcovid.html
Originally posted as a request to the Ministry of Health, Israel
DO NOT TAKE A COVID-19 OR ANNUAL FLU OR OTHER PATHOGENIC VIRUS VACCINE
“I am 85 and will not take a Covid-19 vaccine in its present stage of development, or allow one to be mandated on me regardless of the social cost. And I will not advise my children, grandchildren and great grandchildren to take it. And these are the reasons why:
- We do not have the data. Due to severely limited testing and warp speed development, it is impossible to know if it: prevents any disease, reduces side effects, need of intensive care, or mortality. We simply do not know any of these risks
- As background, no mRNA “vaccine” has ever been brought to market. What is outlined here also applies to “vaccines” based on recombinant DNA (rDNA) vaccines see Nature article under Related [a]. This is not due to lack of attempts to try in the past for a number of medical conditions. It has to do with problems in response during different phases of testing, along with terrible reactions when a virus itself was encountered
- The vaccine manufacturers are immune from liability for any injury or death caused by their product under U.S. law. Currently, this is not true for EU vaccines or a number of other countries worldwide
- Components of the mRNA injection delivery system could cause severe reactions, particularly in sensitive individuals. These individuals will most likely not volunteer to be part of Phase III testing, and they make up a large part of the population
- large parts of the population will not have representation in the trials (very young, the very old, immune compromised, those with other medical conditions)
- It could cause injury and sickness not encountered before, possibly on an unprecedented scale.
- We can not justify the injury, short and long term negative side effects, or death of innocent individuals, or any sub-population provided these injections (even free) to immunize against covid-19 or a similar virus
- There is the morality of using citizens (consenting or otherwise) as ‘experimental subjects’ in the application of a “vaccine” which has only had totally inadequate testing – see item 2 under PROOF below
- To test effectiveness, test subject must be exposed to the live virus, which may be a big problem if the pandemic is finishing. In that case, we will simply not know how the population will react when facing the real virus. Further, to ‘test’ it on developing populations, or subgroups in our own or in any population, is totally immoral
If you do not believe this thinking, please see the following links.
1 – If we do not learn from the past, we are destined to repeat it.
Very important to see (use of vaccines rejected for use in Europe and U.S., tragic reactions, non-informed consent, sterilization),
Gates’ Globalist Vaccine Agenda: A Win-Win for Pharma and Mandatory Vaccination by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Apr 9 2020 Click here for alternate (for Google translations, English voice)
2 – Components of mRNA Technology “Could Lead to Significant Adverse Events in One or More of Our Clinical Trials,” says Moderna Posted by the Children’s Health Defense Team, Aug 6 2020
mRNA “vaccines” undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna injection, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG). The use of PEG in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis. Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of these injections and an increase in adverse side effects. If a PEG-containing mRNA “vaccine” for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous.
Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.” Even if they say they have taken the problems into consideration, it is highly unlikely that this is true within the truncated time line to approval. This must be checked by a non-governmental truly independent group capable of full transparency, testing and evaluation, having all the data and the necessary time. A decision which can cause thousands or even hundreds of thousands of adverse reactions and possibly death is not amenable to warp speed ….
3 – A summary of the “vaccine” history as part of a more extensive article published by The Grayzone
“Behind a veil of corporate media PR, the Gates Foundation has served as a vehicle for Western capital while exploiting the Global South as a human laboratory. The coronavirus pandemic is likely to intensify this disturbing agenda”, Jeremy Loffredo and Michele Greenstein,
Click to continue reading summary Click to read full article
Over 40,000+ Adverse Effects and more than 4,434 Deaths from so called “vaccines” in U.S. so far
“this COVID-19 experimental gene therapy does not meet the CDC’s own definition of a vaccine. It does not provide immunity or prevent transmission of the disease. By referring to this therapy as a “vaccine,” the pharmaceutical companies are attempting to shield themselves, because vaccine injuries or deaths are exempted by law from any product liability lawsuits.”
Please donate to keep us online with writing & creative arts.
The Wordsmith Collection: Writing & Creative Arts
Please support Alternative Media and Education
and other real news resources…
Together we make a difference.
“There is but one truly serious philosophical problem and that is suicide.”
Thanks for all you do.